Thursday, November 5, 2009

Three levels of knowing; Three phases of training

Not too long ago, one of my students sent me an excerpt from a book 101 Things I Learned in Architecture School. While I am not an architect, this person thought the concept was generic enough to be applied to many other aspects of life. I agree. The basic text of this is …

Three Levels of Knowing

SIMPLICITY is the world view of the child or uninformed adult, fully engaged in his own experience and happily unaware of what lies beneath the surface of immediate reality.

COMPLEXITY characterizes the ordinary adult world view. It is characterized by an awareness of complex systems in nature and society but an inability to discern clarifying patterns and connections.

INFORMED SIMPLICITY is an enlightened view of reality. It is founded upon an ability to discern or create clarifying patterns within complex mixtures. Pattern recognition is a crucial skill for an architect, who must create a highly ordered building amid many competing and frequently nebulous design considerations.

This passage was applied to the realm of architecture. However, I agree that the concept has much further reaching implications than to tie it to one area. I liked it but wanted to think about it some more so I printed it off and hung it on my cube wall. This morning I walked in, read it and had an epiphany. For years, I have had a philosophy that martial arts training can be categorized in three distinct phases. I saw this morning that the three levels of knowing are very similar to the three phases of training. The phases I believe are distinct, but the lines between the phases and the length of the phases can change depending on the student. In any case, I believe a student’s training falls into one of these categories.

Phase 1 – Instinct / Reaction
Responses to aggression are driven by a simple reaction. Most of the time, the reaction is driven by instinct and is not the correct or most efficient reaction. A student automatically reacts and has very little control over that response. For example, if an attacker throws a punch, the student may just throw his hands up in some random fashion and hope for the best. If this works, it would be a complete accident. All of this happens at a sub-conscious level.

Phase one of our training is like the SIMPLICITY level of knowing above. Everything is simple and unencumbered by the need to know that something is beneath the surface, waiting to hurt us. When it pops up, we have no idea how to deal with it properly.

Phase 2 – Planning / Thinking
Responses to aggression are driven by thought, calculation and planning. We are trying to use what we learn in class to deal with the aggressive (verbal or physical) behavior. In this case, a student is trying to identity when that punch comes in, analyze it, and respond with the appropriate defense. This could be a block/counter punch, a parry, or an attempt to move out of the way and redirect. The student sees the complexity of the attack and is trying to deal with it the best way he knows how. If he is correct in identifying the attack and is quick enough to implement the correct defense, then he is successful. Otherwise, the defense is too slow and he is hit. All of this happens at a conscious level.

Phase two is like the COMPLEXITY level of knowing in that we are now aware of what is going on but in order to deal with it, we really have to think our way through things. As a result, sometimes we are unable to discern the patterns in of our attackers and unable to formulate the appropriate response in time.

Phase 3 – Instinct / Reaction
Responses to aggression are driven by a simple reaction. The difference this time is that after years of training the body, mind and spirit, reactions are now based on a “new” instinct and are usually much more efficient and effective reactions. This time, at the first hint of an attack, his body reacts without thinking. He has trained enough to know the correct response without thinking about it. He automatically reacts the right way. He is now back to reactions from the sub-conscious level but with an aspect of awareness blended in.

Phase three of our training is like the INFORMED SIMPLICITY level of knowing. In both cases, we have come full circle and are now able to deal with the complexities of our environment but from a deeper, simpler understanding. Your mind and body work together in harmony to recognize and defend against the attack without planning and even much thought. The defense is now a trained reaction.

The more I go through life, the more I learn that all things are interconnected and the number of “rules” that govern the universe is not as many as one would think. Concepts we learn in one area of our life are quite often relevant to other parts of our life as well.

4 comments:

J.S. Kelley said...

Test Comment

Unknown said...

I like this Scooter and I do think it outlines our path very well. I
think you could also draw parallel lines between the 3 phases and our
3 areas of becoming a blackbelt - body, mind, and spirit.

Instinctive reactions come from the body, and those parts of the body
that we don't directly control. Flailing the hands at the sign of an
attack for instance. We overcome that by practicing over and over
again until we have muscle memory build into our body. The body takes
the most fluid path with the least effort. We learn these fluid paths
from practice. Our actions teach us. Stan once told me the main
focus of a student until he is a Blackbelt is body training.

Complex actions are learned through contemplative thought, the mind.
:) Stan said he structured his 2nd degree requirements to focus on
this area.

The third area deals not just with actions, but right actions. This
is the strongest evidence of our Buddhist influence. I also think the
Holy Spirit will guide us in this area. Our spirit is our will, the
things that leads all actions, and if we learn to listen, will lead us
to the informed simplicity you talk bout. The right actions are those
that exclude judgment and promote harmony. They are the simplest
paths that can be found. I think many people do not see this, and
that is why we loose people at this stage of their training, weather
they have earned their third degrees or not.

But to sum up I really like this post. Thanks for sharing it Scooter

Romie

Hawk said...

A most excellent article. Thanks for sharing. If you don't mind, I am going to re-post this on our dojo blog in Richmond.

J

christy said...

i've been meaning to respond to this for a while, so my apologies.

i think your interpretation makes a lot of sense. i recognize (in a personal experience kind of way) the parallels you have drawn for training, in lieu of architecture (though i am still definitely on the path somewhere :) )

i've been finding that my understanding of the scope of aikido, and the patterns within the families of techniques (both families of types of techniques as well as families of movement), has been slowly clarifying, as well. not that i can anywhere near execute them on that level, but it's kind of exhilarating to have some clarity of understanding, at least! i am still fascinated with your concept for the as-yet-not-written chart .. different attacks, different ways to respond to the attacks, end up at various midpoints, options to finish. mental understanding is a long way from having the techniques clarified to the point where they're part of your being in the way that you suggest for phase 3... takemusu-aiki - "a state in which aiki principles are so manifest in a person that perfect techniques arise spontaneously from the energy of the moment." what i'm trying to describe is that, prior to and separate from the techniques becoming part of your whole being (so that takemusu aiki is possible), i think there is a process of mental understanding. when you start training, it seems like there are a gazillion techniques - and they all seem different. you go to practice, and techniques you work on one day aren't immediately recognizable as being remotely related to techniques you worked on a previous day. eventually your brain starts organizing them so that they don't seem quite as varied and disconnected. some level of clarity is achieved. patterns become recognizable.

i think there are probably parallels for most bodies of knowledge. i'll have to think about it some more :)